🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how little it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.